Olivia Boykin Blog Post #7 Routman Chapter 10: Examine Guided Reading
I
chose to read this chapter for my last blog post because I can best relate to
it due to the “grouping,” “management,” and “centers” topics discussed within
the chapter. Right off the bat I loved that
it reads, “Students need ample demonstrations and support before we “hand over”
most of the learning responsibility to them.
When students have not had enough demonstrations and guided
demonstrations, we wind up spending too much time on word work, concepts, and
strategies in guided reading – work that could easily have been taught in
guided demonstrations.” (p. 152) I sometimes
find myself trying to rush the demonstration and directions but normally find
that I then spend more time having to re-explain which then takes more time
away from learning than it would have taken to do it right from the beginning.
As a side note, I don’t know that
I agree with Routman on the ability grouping issue, though, but I’m still “on
the fence.” As a parent, I like that my
daughter is now with a group of students who excel academically and care about
their learning. I believe this is the
reason there are very few disruptions due to behavior issues or someone not “getting”
a concept because he/she is a grade level or more “behind.” As a teacher, I think there would be some pros
to teaching that class but I think I’d choose to teach the “lowest” class. I seem to be able to reach those students
best. On the flip side, I think the “lowest”
students need to be in a smaller class because there is more “one-on-one” needed
with a class where essential skills have been missed along the way. Also, generally speaking, the “low” class is
where we find most of the “behavior issues” so the low numbers would be a
benefit in that area, as well. On the
flip side, I find that there are times when I ask one of my “higher” students
to work with one of my “lower” students and that something clicks for the
person who is struggling that hasn’t clicked when I’ve said or done the same
thing. Peer tutoring is one of my “go-to”
strategies and if I group the students correctly I find that it is highly
beneficial.
That leads me to the real reason
I chose this chapter: grouping. When I have students move from one math
station to another I find that homogeneous grouping works best when they move
to the “teacher station” but heterogeneous grouping works best for stations in
which they are playing a “game” or explaining a process to one another. Also, I try to make sure the students in each
group get along (as much as possible) so as to prevent unnecessary issues
arising while I’m working with groups. I
really need to work on this aspect of my station planning because it also
affects my classroom seating charts. This
is a “gift” my previous “partner-in-crime” had and we played to our strengths
and that saved me so much time and more gray hair. Now that I am switching up groups weekly (and
sometimes daily) according to which skill is causing certain students grief, I’m
having to focus on one of my weakest areas so I’m getting better at grouping because
of all the practice I’m getting. (It
still takes me way too long and I think I covered “lack of time” in a previous
blog.)
I do love that management has
also been a strength of mine (until recently) so I felt good about managing my
groups. In years past I didn’t have to worry
about what my students were doing in their groups because I did trust them and
knew that we had spent the needed time discussing and demonstrating how the stations
should look and sound. Now, though,
times they are a-changing and I don’t feel that my stations are as effective as
they were in previous years. I’m hoping
that this year is just a fluke in regards to this and that next year we can get
back on track with group learning and stations.