At the beginning of Routman’s
Chapter 8 – Teaching Comprehension, she suggests that our current emphasis
on word calling and fluency is keeping students from thinking and comprehending
what they are reading. We are creating
students who sound like good readers and look like good readers, but they are unable
to discuss what they have read on any deeper level. I would say that I have seen this to be true
over and over this semester as I have administered IRI’s with students from 2nd-5th
grade. MANY of them have very few
miscues, but when we get to the comprehension portion of IRI, they show very
little evidence that they took any meaning from the words they read so
eloquently.
Routman says that teaching comprehension strategies in
isolation is valuable, but only if it is paired with teacher modeling. She shares the 80/20 rule . . . 20% of our
instructional time should be spent on instruction and 80% should be spent on application. I need to remember this during the Inquiry
Unit I am going to do with my small group over the next few weeks. I need to make sure that my mini-lessons are
in fact mini. I need to be sure and
model my own thinking while I am reading.
I need to give them the
opportunity to apply what we have learned during the rest of our time together.
Many times, as a classroom teacher, I would model my own
thinking (and use of strategies) while I was reading a novel aloud: “That part
reminds me of when . . . and it makes me wonder . . . “ I
would ask students questions to give them an opportunity to share their thinking,
too. However, sometimes DURING strategy instruction, I might have pushed them
too hard to make connections or to come up with a question for a certain page
instead of allowing it to happen naturally and encouraging them at that
time.
I love this, Kelli! Yes, we are teaching so much more than a menu of strategies--we are teaching readers to be flexible thinkers and problem solvers! Meaning is the reason to read!
ReplyDelete